There has been a trend to charge higher fees for
coaching than for private, face-to-face counselling
or therapy,
and even higher fees than for therapy billed to insurance companies.
However, while I
was working on this website - which took months
to develop - the worldwide financial crisis was
deepening.
I realised that high fees are
not justifiable in today's economic climate, no matter what the
coaching pundits say. I decided to reduce my fees to what
I perceive as fair. What clinched this decision was
learning that a psychotherapist friend, who has many years'
experience and lives in an affluent area, was charging one-third
less for face-to-face sessions than the going rate a few years
ago.
It is not true (if it ever was)
that a coach who charges less devalues him- or herself.
It is no longer true that
clients are prepared to pay more for less.
What is true is that a coach who
sticks to outdated business beliefs in a changing world needs to
re-examine his/her business model. You want a coach who
accepts and responds to change, and who lives in the real world,
don't you?
One American consulting firm,
referring to the cost of professional development courses, talks
about "the fallacy of executive-level pricing". That
firm provides educational resources for executives that are free
or almost-free, and they have been doing it for years. Of
course, their programme is a wonderful way of generating massive
publicity for their consulting work. They also earn from selling
the textbooks that support the courses. The provision of some
free resources is a strategy that has been taken up by many
coaches, but executive-level pricing is still widespread in the
coaching profession.
Executives today, if they have
any sense, will not be dazzled by "executive-level pricing"
while they are downsizing their company fleets and planning
redundancies. Apart from the few coaches who coach the
super-rich and powerful, and who can charge what they like, the
rest of us need a hefty dose of realism.
People
with average incomes who are feeling the pinch will simply stay
away from the high-priced coaches.
Yet coaches are bombarded with
marketing plans that insist that the coach should not price
himself/herself too cheaply. Like a high-class perfume, a little
coaching should cost a lot. Theoretically, this is because
it will have impact and value in the client's life.
Marketing pundits are urging us to raise our fees even higher to
generate a feeling of exclusivity!
No wonder some
marketing gurus for coaches are even producing e-books for
underperforming coaches, suggesting radical solutions such as
getting a day job - easier said than done these days! Even
office drudgery is seen as a better alternative than setting a
more modest level of fees! Why is the principle of high
coaching fees so sacred?
Some coaches might be afraid of
an undignified professional price war. The reality is that
deflation has been occurring in the field of personal
development and therapies, and it has been happening for years.
Coach training, NLP training, hypnotherapy and Reiki courses are
only some examples of fields where costs have plummeted,
especially if some or all of the training is undertaken by
distance learning. There are even some free entry-level
trainings that are pretty good. The result is thousands
more people qualifying as helpers every year. Trainers
like to talk about huge income potential for doing fairly
little, and can mention the fact that there are millions of
potential clients out there. "Everyone needs a coach" is
the trainer's mantra. Yet the plain fact is that everyone
does not have a coach, and maintaining high fees in
the current economic climate will not encourage the take-up of
coaching. The hype about a limitless client base sounds a
bit like a multi-level marketing bubble, does it not?
In today's times,
coaching may well generate hope and creativity and many ideas
for changing life for the better. Yet, the best of those
plans may need to be put on the back burner until economic
conditions improve, and until then, the focus might have to be
how to manage in today's circumstances without too much stress -
while working towards a better tomorrow.
And during that transitional
period, a client could well benefit from regular coaching to
hold the vision of the future - but at high fees, the same
client will be torn between the desire to be coached and the
need to make ends meet. The result: dropping out of coaching,
and probably never wanting to be coached again.
What kind of role models are
coaches being if they insist that the only way to gain (self-) respect
is to command high fees?
What does that say about core
values when the underlying idea is that only those with money -
or who charge high fees - are to be respected?
What kind of rapport does a
coach gain with a client if he or she cannot appreciate that £
90 an hour is simply not in the client's reality?
Someone once said that doing the
same thing again and again and expecting different results is
insanity. Do coaches sticking to their high-price fee
schedules and getting no clients need a reality check?
They certainly won't get any other kind of check.
Maybe clients - and the real
world - can even teach us coaches something.
Revised February
2009.
For more details
of coaching by Morris Berg see the various sections of this
website
www.sensitivenlpcoach.com
This article is
copyright © Morris Berg 2009 and must not be reproduced
on-line, in print or by any other means without permission in writing.
email Morris at
hspcoach@gmail.com
to print,
email or share this page - use this "bookmark" widget
>>>