to print,
email or share this page - use this "bookmark" widget
>>>
I am writing an article on this
topic - in the meantime here are some brief notes.
The boundaries between coaching
and therapy are a constant source of confusion.
Here are the main questions:
Is coaching different from
therapy, and why?
Should practitioners be mixing
coaching and therapy?
Should clients move from
coaching to therapy with the same person?
Let's attempt some answers -
these are not meant to be written in stone, but just
exploratory opinions.
First of all, coaching evolved
in the USA and its models in other countries have tended to
inherit very American attitudes. One of those attitudes is
that coaching and therapy do not mix. This is mainly
for legal and insurance reasons - in America psychotherapy
or counselling is normally paid for by insurance schemes and
follows some sort of diagnosis. If coaches are seen to do
anything like "therapy" they lay themselves open to all
sorts of legal difficulties.
In America, also, liability
(malpractice) insurance for counselling and psychotherapy
can cost a small fortune and is considered a different risk
from coaching, which again is why the two are normally kept
separate. UK coaches who are also therapists normally get
insurance from one company covering both therapy and
coaching, and the cost is very reasonable. UK insurance
companies generally don't care whether therapy or coaching
is being offered.
So in the US, as many barriers as
possible between the two fields have been put in place, such
as insisting that coaching focuses on the present and the
future but not on the past; different behaviours expected
from coaches and therapists; coaches should not even talk
like therapists at any time; and so on.
A fundamental difference remains
between coaching and therapy and that has to do with the
autonomy of the client and the equality of the relationship
between coach and client. A therapist is, theoretically, in
a position of power; a coach is the equal of the client.
Coachees direct the agenda; therapy clients are led, fed
interpretations, and so on.
However in real life the
boundaries are fuzzier, especially in the UK where most
therapy, and all coaching, is private and not covered by
medical insurance or the National Health service. For
years before life coaching was a distinct profession, people
were going to counsellors and therapists for help with the
sorts of issues that they now take up with coaches. In fact,
when coaching emerged, many therapists jumped on the
bandwagon, calling themselves coaches without any specific
qualifications in it!
As for the different type of
relationship, if you are not talking about severe
psychological problems or very long-term therapy, most
therapy clients are pretty much in control and decide what,
when and how to tell the therapist! They also fire
their therapists pretty often! Therapy clients
as well as coaching clients resist doing tasks set as
homework and can tend to expect the helper to do all the
work.
For a long time, therapy clients
towards the end of their therapy sought a lighter form of
help from the same person, focusing on getting their lives
together in the present and looking towards the future. What
else could you call this but coaching? Moving
from therapy to coaching - without explicitly naming it as
such, was normal, but moving from coaching to therapy with
the same person is questionable - why? Only if you
assume the client is suddenly weaker and the therapist
suddenly has more power. But there is another way of looking
at it - imagine the "therapy" as a specialised technique
offered by the coach (also a trained therapist) when an
issue deeply rooted in the past emerges, or when more
in-depth work is obviously required. As long as there are no
insurance, legal or licensing complications, what is wrong
with that? The whole is taking place within a
framework of helping the client towards a better life.
It is an insult to the client to imagine he or she is
suddenly going to lose power or be more vulnerable because
he /she is asking for more help. Moving from coaching to
therapy within a caring professional relationship can be
likened to "increasing the power of the microscope" to focus
on what is really going on with the client.
In the UK, various forms of help
have developed forms for both working with the present and
future AND for working with the past. Hypnotherapy has
developed various forms of hypnotic coaching (at least one
of which does not actually involve much hypnosis!) And
cognitive behavioural therapy, has both therapeutic and
coaching "flavours" yet concentrates on the present and
future rather than the past. NLP and EFT practitioners may
deal with both the past and the present/future yet neither
of them is in itself counselling or psychotherapy (so may
ignore the whole present/past boundary completely!)
So, boundaries between coaching
and therapy in the UK are much more flexible and many people
offer both or a mixture of the two. In the US, depending on
local state laws and regulations, ways around the
past/present boundary can involve declaring that one is not
a therapist, or operating under the banner of a religious
ministry, etc.
As the psychotherapies become
more regulated in the UK, there will be a shift towards more
therapists redefining themselves as coaches, NLP
practitioners, etc. if they do not have the "right"
up-to-date training and do not want to spend years and a
small fortune retraining. (In the UK, being a member of some
form of alternative ministry does not give a person any
special status or rights as it can do in the US.)
Do you need coaching or therapy?
Unlike coaches in the US, or coaches who do NOT have any
experience as therapists/counsellors, I will not impose any
artificial limitations on where your work with me can go.
I will listen to you first and together we will decide on
the way forward.
Morris Berg
This page is
copyright © Morris Berg 2009 and must not be reproduced
without permission in writing.
email Morris at
hspcoach@gmail.com
to print,
email or share this page - use this "bookmark" widget
>>>